TOPIK II · LEVEL 5

-(으)ㄹ 턱이 없다

Use -(으)ㄹ 턱이 없다 to say firmly that, given what you know, something simply cannot be true or happen: "there's no way that ~".

추측·판단Guessing & judging

Han: Not being able to walk is a matter of ability, so -(으)ㄹ 수 없다 is needed; 턱이 없다 only judges whether something is likely to be true.

Examples

처음 만난 사람이 제 이름을 알 턱이 있나요?How could someone I've just met know my name?
그렇게 착한 사람이 거짓말을 했을 턱이 없어요.There's no way such a kind person lied.
공부를 하나도 안 했는데 시험에 붙을 턱이 없지.I didn't study at all, so there's no way I'll pass the exam.
월급은 그대로인데 생활이 나아질 턱이 없다.My salary hasn't changed, so there's no way life will get any better.

Don’t mix up

-(으)ㄹ 턱이 없다vs-(으)ㄹ 리가 없다Same meaning, but 리가 없다 is the neutral, all-purpose form (fine in formal writing), while 턱이 없다 sounds more colloquial and emphatic: 그 사람이 그랬을 리가 없어요.
-(으)ㄹ 턱이 없다vs-(으)ㄹ 수 없다수 없다 says someone is unable or not allowed; 턱이 없다 says something is unlikely to be true: 저는 매운 음식을 먹을 수 없어요 (I can't) vs. 그 사람이 매운 음식을 먹었을 턱이 없어요 (no way he did).

How to build it

V/A+(으)ㄹ 턱이 없다 · N+일 턱이 없다 · past: V/A+았/었을 턱이 없다

알다 → 알 턱이 없다, 하다 → 했을 턱이 없다

  1. It expresses the speaker's judgment about likelihood, not ability. To say someone is unable to do something, use -(으)ㄹ 수 없다 instead.
  2. For a past event, put the past tense before -을: 했을 턱이 없다 ("there's no way he did it"), not 할 턱이 없었다.
  3. It is often used as a rhetorical question with the same meaning: -(으)ㄹ 턱이 있나요? / 있겠어요?
  4. It sounds emphatic and fairly colloquial; in formal writing -(으)ㄹ 리가 없다 is usually the safer choice.

Classic mistake

Wrong: 저는 다리를 다쳐서 걸을 턱이 없어요.

Right: 저는 다리를 다쳐서 걸을 수 없어요.

Not being able to walk is a matter of ability, so -(으)ㄹ 수 없다 is needed; 턱이 없다 only judges whether something is likely to be true.

Practise -(으)ㄹ 턱이 없다 on real TOPIK questions

Hannim plans each day up to your exam date: questions on this pattern, reviews, full mock papers and graded writing. 7 days free, no card.

Start 7-day free trial

More level 5 grammar

All TOPIK grammar